[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9a34cf3-96a5-4a92-8e4c-34d67b1d3fe8@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 18:17:01 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: ziy@...dia.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, npache@...hat.com,
ryan.roberts@....com, baohua@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] khugepaged: Optimize collapse_pte_mapped_thp() by
PTE batching
On 22.07.25 17:05, Dev Jain wrote:
> Use PTE batching to optimize collapse_pte_mapped_thp().
>
> On arm64, suppose khugepaged is scanning a pte-mapped 2MB THP for collapse.
> Then, calling ptep_clear() for every pte will cause a TLB flush for every
> contpte block. Instead, clear_ptes() does a contpte_try_unfold_partial()
> which will flush the TLB only for the (if any) starting and ending contpte
> block, if they partially overlap with the range khugepaged is looking at.
>
> For all arches, there should be a benefit due to batching atomic operations
> on mapcounts due to folio_remove_rmap_ptes() and saving some calls.
Please simplify that (and make it less arm specific) like suggested for
patch #2.
PTE batching has known benefits on all architectures :)
>
> Note that we do not need to make a change to the check
> "if (folio_page(folio, i) != page)"; if i'th page of the folio is equal
> to the first page of our batch, then i + 1, .... i + nr_batch_ptes - 1
> pages of the folio will be equal to the corresponding pages of our
> batch mapping consecutive pages.
Yeah, that must stay to make the comment from "step 1" happy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
> ---
> mm/khugepaged.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index 63517ef7eafb..1ff0c7dd2be4 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -1503,15 +1503,16 @@ static int set_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> bool install_pmd)
> {
> + int nr_mapped_ptes = 0, nr_batch_ptes, result = SCAN_FAIL;
> struct mmu_notifier_range range;
> bool notified = false;
> unsigned long haddr = addr & HPAGE_PMD_MASK;
> + unsigned long end = haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
> struct vm_area_struct *vma = vma_lookup(mm, haddr);
> struct folio *folio;
> pte_t *start_pte, *pte;
> pmd_t *pmd, pgt_pmd;
> spinlock_t *pml = NULL, *ptl;
> - int nr_ptes = 0, result = SCAN_FAIL;
> int i;
>
> mmap_assert_locked(mm);
> @@ -1625,11 +1626,15 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> goto abort;
>
> /* step 2: clear page table and adjust rmap */
> - for (i = 0, addr = haddr, pte = start_pte;
> - i < HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, pte++) {
> + for (i = 0, addr = haddr, pte = start_pte; i < HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> + i += nr_batch_ptes, addr += nr_batch_ptes * PAGE_SIZE,
> + pte += nr_batch_ptes) {
> + int max_nr_batch_ptes = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;> struct
page *page;
> pte_t ptent = ptep_get(pte);
>
> + nr_batch_ptes = 1;
> +
> if (pte_none(ptent))
> continue;
> /*
> @@ -1643,26 +1648,29 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> goto abort;
> }
> page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, ptent);
> +
> if (folio_page(folio, i) != page)
> goto abort;
>
> + nr_batch_ptes = folio_pte_batch(folio, pte, ptent, max_nr_batch_ptes);
Same comment regarding matching types for folio_pte_batch(), now that we
changed that -- unsigned int.
> +
> /*
> * Must clear entry, or a racing truncate may re-remove it.
> * TLB flush can be left until pmdp_collapse_flush() does it.
> * PTE dirty? Shmem page is already dirty; file is read-only.
> */
> - ptep_clear(mm, addr, pte);
> - folio_remove_rmap_pte(folio, page, vma);
> - nr_ptes++;
> + clear_ptes(mm, addr, pte, nr_batch_ptes);
> + folio_remove_rmap_ptes(folio, page, nr_batch_ptes, vma);
> + nr_mapped_ptes += nr_batch_ptes;
> }
>
> if (!pml)
> spin_unlock(ptl);
>
> /* step 3: set proper refcount and mm_counters. */
> - if (nr_ptes) {
> - folio_ref_sub(folio, nr_ptes);
> - add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio), -nr_ptes);
> + if (nr_mapped_ptes) {
> + folio_ref_sub(folio, nr_mapped_ptes);
> + add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio), -nr_mapped_ptes);
> }
>
> /* step 4: remove empty page table */
> @@ -1695,10 +1703,10 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> : SCAN_SUCCEED;
> goto drop_folio;
> abort:
> - if (nr_ptes) {
> + if (nr_mapped_ptes) {
> flush_tlb_mm(mm);
> - folio_ref_sub(folio, nr_ptes);
> - add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio), -nr_ptes);
> + folio_ref_sub(folio, nr_mapped_ptes);
> + add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio), -nr_mapped_ptes);
Doing the TLB flush and adjusting the refcount after dropping the PTL
... interesting. Well, nothing surprises me in khugpaged code anymore.
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists