lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dbx8bjpbalx4.fsf@ynaffit-andsys.c.googlers.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 15:41:11 -0700
From: Tiffany Yang <ynaffit@...gle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...weicloud.com>, 
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, 
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, 
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, 
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Chen Ridong <chenridong@...wei.com>, 
	kernel-team@...roid.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] cgroup: Track time in cgroup v2 freezer

Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> writes:

> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 09:52:38PM +0800, Chen Ridong wrote:
>> > With the given implementation (and use scenario), this'd better exposed
>> > in
>> >   cgroup.freeze.stat.local
>> >

>> Would it be possible to add this field to either cgroup.event or  
>> cgroup.stat?
>> Since the frozen status is already tracked in cgroup.event, this  
>> placement would maintain better
>> cohesion with existing metrics.

>> This is just a suggestion.

> Yeah, given that the freezer is an integral part of cgroup core, using
> cgroup.stat[.local] probably makes more sense.

> Thanks.

One of the reasons I avoided cgroup.stat was because I interpreted its
purpose to be for exposing cgroup metadata (i.e., descendants and
descendants per subsystem), and I didn't think this value fit in neatly.

It doesn't seem like there currently exists a cgroup.stat.local, but if
that is the preferred location for this accounting, I could create one
and print it there!

-- 
Tiffany Y. Yang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ