[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP4=nvQWCWAOefHAqA82-VDb-00_y1-0fPOPBEyETJ2Q1EWEwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 09:03:24 +0200
From: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, Luis Goncalves <lgoncalv@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Chang Yin <cyin@...hat.com>,
Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@...hat.com>, Crystal Wood <crwood@...hat.com>,
Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] Documentation/rtla: Add actions feature
Ășt 22. 7. 2025 v 0:35 odesĂlatel Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> napsal:
>
> I'm curious to what is looked for for triggering an action. We can poll on
> events and get woken when they are triggered. It may be possible to add
> even more ways to wake a task waiting for something to happen.
>
Threshold actions are triggered immediately after a sample over the
set threshold is detected by rtla. For BPF mode, this happens almost
right after the sample is processed in the BPF program and the
scheduler gets to waking up rtla following a BPF ringbuffer write.
There is only a short delay (up to tens of microseconds) because the
BPF helper defers the wake-up into irq_work.
For non-BPF mode, rtla periodically pulls samples from tracefs, when
it does that, it also checks whether tracing has been turned off. If
yes, that means there was a threshold overflow, and actions are
triggered. Since the period for that is currently set to 1 second, the
action might be delayed up to one second from the threshold occurring,
That delay might be a problem if you need to collect a lot of data
from a ringbuffer in the action, e.g. global Intel PT data collection
for precise troubleshooting of difficult latencies.
Of course, this is just an implementational limitation of the timerlat
tracer. If timerlat had an event (like osnoise's "sample_threshold")
triggered on threshold overflow and if it is possible to wait on it
even without BPF, rtla could wait on that for both BPF and non-BPF
mode instead of what it is currently doing.
Tomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists