[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250722013449.146233-1-irogers@google.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 18:34:49 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Jean-Philippe Romain <jean-philippe.romain@...s.st.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1] perf pfm: Don't force loading of all PMUs
Force loading all PMUs adds significant cost because DRM and other
PMUs are loaded, it should also not be required if the pmus__
functions are used.
Tested by run perf test, in particular the pfm related tests. Also
`perf list` is identical before and after.
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
---
tools/perf/util/pfm.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pfm.c b/tools/perf/util/pfm.c
index 0dacc133ed39..e89395814e88 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pfm.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pfm.c
@@ -47,10 +47,6 @@ int parse_libpfm_events_option(const struct option *opt, const char *str,
p_orig = p = strdup(str);
if (!p)
return -1;
- /*
- * force loading of the PMU list
- */
- perf_pmus__scan(NULL);
for (q = p; strsep(&p, ",{}"); q = p) {
sep = p ? str + (p - p_orig - 1) : "";
--
2.50.0.727.gbf7dc18ff4-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists