[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7748caaf-4f32-461a-ba32-9311c04fec63@amperemail.onmicrosoft.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 17:40:13 +0800
From: Shijie Huang <shijie@...eremail.onmicrosoft.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: Huang Shijie <shijie@...amperecomputing.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, patches@...erecomputing.com,
cl@...ux.com, Shubhang@...amperecomputing.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched/fair: do not scan twice in detach_tasks()
On 2025/7/22 15:53, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> more_balance:
>> rq_lock_irqsave(busiest, &rf);
>> update_rq_clock(busiest);
>>
>> + if (!env.loop_max)
>> + env.loop_max = min(sysctl_sched_nr_migrate,
>> busiest->cfs.h_nr_runnable);
> it should be h_nr_queued as mentioned by Huang and my patch has been
> messed up by my web browser
okay, I can create a patch later, and send it out after it passes the
Specjbb test.
Thanks
Huang Shijie
Powered by blists - more mailing lists