[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72k+_UsRTVNWzz3jT+Nkjb-Xom2JmZ9Kaoba4=Omh2EgaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 13:39:52 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
Mitchell Levy <levymitchell0@...il.com>, Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: sync: fix safety comment for `static_lock_class`
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 1:21 PM Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> We can take this patch, as it definitely is an improvement, but I think
Yeah, thanks, that was the intention -- we were checking a few older series :)
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists