[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250722122844.2199661-1-mzhivich@akamai.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:28:44 -0400
From: Michael Zhivich <mzhivich@...mai.com>
To: <stable@...r.kernel.org>, <bp@...en8.de>
CC: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Zhivich
<mzhivich@...mai.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86/bugs: Fix use of possibly uninit value in amd_check_tsa_microcode()
For kernels compiled with CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE=y, the value of __reserved
field in zen_patch_rev union on the stack may be garbage. If so, it will
prevent correct microcode check when consulting p.ucode_rev, resulting in
incorrect mitigation selection.
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Zhivich <mzhivich@...mai.com>
Fixes: 7a0395f6607a5 ("x86/bugs: Add a Transient Scheduler Attacks mitigation")
---
Changes in v2:
- Rework patch per feedback
- Add Cc: stable
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index efd42ee9d1cc..289ff197b1b3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -378,6 +378,8 @@ static bool amd_check_tsa_microcode(void)
p.model = c->x86_model;
p.ext_model = c->x86_model >> 4;
p.stepping = c->x86_stepping;
+ /* reserved bits are expected to be 0 in test below */
+ p.__reserved = 0;
if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ZEN3) ||
cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ZEN4)) {
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists