[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=McTJnTn1sf6Kc42yePvUyP87h1utJ7B_ynWjUxxm0E4Lw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 14:33:20 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com>
Cc: aaro.koskinen@....fi, andreas@...nade.info, khilman@...libre.com,
rogerq@...nel.org, tony@...mide.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, m-leonard@...com, praneeth@...com,
jcormier@...ticallink.com, christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] Add TI TPS65214 PMIC GPIO Support
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 1:32 AM Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com> wrote:
>
> The related MFD series was integrated in mainline during 6.15 cycle [0].
>
> TPS65214 is a Power Management Integrated Circuit (PMIC) that has
> significant register map overlap with TPS65219. The series introduces
> TPS65214 and restructures the existing driver to support multiple devices.
>
> TPS65215's GPIO specs are the same as TPS65219, so the "tps65219-gpio"
> compatible string is assigned to two devices in the TPS65219 MFD driver.
> No additional support is required in the GPIO driver for TPS65215.
>
> - TPS65214 has 1 GPIO & 1 GPO, whereas TPS65219/TPS65215 both have 1 GPIO &
> 2 GPOs.
> - TPS65214' GPIO direction can be changed with register GENERAL_CONFIG and
> bit GPIO_CONFIG during device operation.
> - TPS65219's MULTI_DEVICE_ENABLE bit in register MFP_1_CFG maps to
> TPS65214's GPIO_VSEL_CONFIG bit.
>
> TPS65214 Datasheet: https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/TPS65214
> TPS65214 TRM: https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/slvud30
> TPS65215 TRM: https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/slvucw5/
>
> Tested on Jon Cormier's AM62x platform with TPS65219.
> GPIO offsets remained consistent and functional.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com>
> Tested-by: Jonathan Cormier <jcormier@...ticallink.com>
> ---
This doesn't apply on top of my gpio/for-next branch. Do you think you
can quickly submit another iteration rebased on top of it?
Bartosz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists