lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ba94864-769c-4a73-8e70-a3904280317f@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 14:38:07 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>,
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski
 <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, quic_pkumpatl@...cinc.com,
 kernel@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: codecs: wsa883x: Handle shared reset GPIO
 for WSA883x speakers

On 22/07/2025 13:11, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:

Again, trim the output from irrelevant parts.

> [   10.928781][   T90] Call trace:
> [   10.932024][   T90]  _regulator_put+0x50/0x60 (P)
> [   10.936877][   T90]  regulator_put+0x30/0x48
> [   10.941276][   T90]  devm_regulator_release+0x14/0x20
> [   10.946486][   T90]  release_nodes+0x60/0xfc
> [   10.950886][   T90]  devres_release_all+0x90/0xe0
> [   10.955737][   T90]  device_unbind_cleanup+0x18/0x60
> [   10.960846][   T90]  really_probe+0x210/0x2c0
> [   10.965341][   T90]  __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x120

Although wsa probe function is not here, but this feels like it deferred
or exited with failure and some cleanups were incomplete. Current code
looks correct, so I suspect that whatever you did there introduced the
errors. So bug in your code is the answer that you converted it to devm
interface. That conversion should be rather separate patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ