linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] i2c-host-fixes for v6.16-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <wxsmvpqszpz5rcutlqzuznmur2snfgvilpukxmlzdtvqxmlv5u@njfcqtmmbrio>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 15:45:26 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] i2c-host-fixes for v6.16-rc7

Hi Wolfram,

On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 08:19:50PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Andi,
> 
> > in this pull request you have included also the previous week's
> > patches. Everything is rebased on top of rc6.
> 
> Sorry, not pulled. Maybe they slipped through the cracks, but I wrote
> two mails *not* to send me a rebased branch but an incrementally updated
> one [1] [2]. Rebasing public trees pulled in by someone else lead to a
> number of problems e.g. original mail of thread [2].

sorry, I missed your second e-mail and I misunderstood your first
e-mail (I thought you haven't pulled anything, yet).

> So, I just sent last weeks PR to Linus. If that is in rc7, then you can
> rebase the missing patches from here to rc7. Because that one I haven't
> pulled yet.
> 
> Makes sense?

OK, I will now rebase everything missing on top of rc7.

Thanks and sorry for the confusion,
Andi