lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aH-dqcMWj3cFDos2@google.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 07:18:17 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, 
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, 
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, 
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org, 
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86-cpuid@...ts.linux.dev, 
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] x86: Reorder headers alphabetically

On Tue, Jul 22, 2025, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> Multiple x86 source files use the cpuid_*() macros, but implicitly
> include the main CPUID API header.
> 
> Sort their include lines so that <asm/cpuid/api.h> can be explicitly
> included next.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@...utronix.de>
> ---
>  arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c           |  8 +--
>  arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c               |  5 +-
>  arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c          | 14 +++---
>  arch/x86/events/zhaoxin/core.c        | 11 ++---
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c           | 70 +++++++++++++--------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c             | 25 +++++-----
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c        | 62 ++++++++++++------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c   | 12 ++---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c  | 22 ++++-----
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 11 +++--
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c        | 28 ++++++-----
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c    |  5 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c       |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_common.c |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c          | 13 ++---
>  arch/x86/kernel/jailhouse.c           |  9 ++--
>  arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c                 | 35 +++++++-------
>  arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c            | 28 +++++------
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c                | 56 ++++++++++-----------
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c                | 25 +++++-----
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c                | 50 +++++++++----------
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c          |  6 ++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/sgx.c                |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c                | 18 +++----

If this series is squeezed into Linus' tree just before rc1, I suppose I'm fine
with this patch.  But I am NOT providing an ack for general inclusion, because
the potential for pain is not worth the warm fuzzies we get by having sorted
includes.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ