[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aIDuEcHhaGtz2klP@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 17:13:37 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Yasin Lee <yasin.lee.x@...il.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: proximity: hx9023s: fix scan_type endianness
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 06:08:37PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> On 7/22/25 6:07 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> > Change the scan_type endianness from IIO_BE to IIO_LE. This matches
> > the call to cpu_to_le16() in hx9023s_trigger_handler() that formats
> > the data before pushing it to the IIO buffer.
> It is odd to have data already in CPU-endian and convert it to LE
> before pushing to buffers. So I'm a bit tempted to do this instead
> since it probably isn't likely anyone is using this on a big-endian
> system:
I can say that first of all, we need to consult with the datasheet for the
actual HW endianess. And second, I do not believe that CPU endianess may be
used, I can't imagine when this (discrete?) component can be integrated in such
a way. That said, I think your second approach even worse.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists