[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af8ceac7-851c-438d-8112-c1586427f58a@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 09:42:38 -0700
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
To: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@...ux.dev>, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
john.fastabend@...il.com, andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, mykolal@...com, shuah@...nel.org,
laoar.shao@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, leon.hwang@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching
tracing programs to functions in deny list
On 7/22/25 8:34 AM, KaFai Wan wrote:
> The result:
>
> $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs -t tracing_failure/tracing_deny
> #468/3 tracing_failure/tracing_deny:OK
> #468 tracing_failure:OK
> Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>
> Signed-off-by: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@...ux.dev>
LGTM but see a nit below.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
> ---
> .../bpf/prog_tests/tracing_failure.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_failure.c | 6 ++++
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_failure.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_failure.c
> index a222df765bc3..140fb0d175cf 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_failure.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_failure.c
> @@ -28,10 +28,43 @@ static void test_bpf_spin_lock(bool is_spin_lock)
> tracing_failure__destroy(skel);
> }
>
> +static void test_tracing_deny(void)
> +{
> + struct tracing_failure *skel;
> + char log_buf[256];
> + int btf_id, err;
> +
> + /* migrate_disable depends on CONFIG_SMP */
> + btf_id = libbpf_find_vmlinux_btf_id("migrate_disable", BPF_TRACE_FENTRY);
> + if (btf_id <= 0) {
> + test__skip();
> + return;
> + }
There is a discussion about inlining migrate_disable(). See
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQ+Afov4E=9t=3M=zZmO9z4ZqT6imWD5xijDHshTf3J=RA@mail.gmail.com/
Maybe trying to find a different function? Otherwise, if migrate_disable
is inlined and this test will become useless.
> +
> + skel = tracing_failure__open();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "tracing_failure__open"))
> + return;
> +
> + bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.tracing_deny, true);
> + bpf_program__set_log_buf(skel->progs.tracing_deny, log_buf, sizeof(log_buf));
> +
> + err = tracing_failure__load(skel);
> + if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "tracing_failure__load"))
> + goto out;
> +
> + ASSERT_HAS_SUBSTR(log_buf,
> + "Attaching tracing programs to function 'migrate_disable' is rejected.",
> + "log_buf");
> +out:
> + tracing_failure__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> void test_tracing_failure(void)
> {
> if (test__start_subtest("bpf_spin_lock"))
> test_bpf_spin_lock(true);
> if (test__start_subtest("bpf_spin_unlock"))
> test_bpf_spin_lock(false);
> + if (test__start_subtest("tracing_deny"))
> + test_tracing_deny();
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_failure.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_failure.c
> index d41665d2ec8c..dfa152e8194e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_failure.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_failure.c
> @@ -18,3 +18,9 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_spin_unlock, struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +SEC("?fentry/migrate_disable")
> +int BPF_PROG(tracing_deny)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists