[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <175329184572.30139.15349467815781298838.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 10:30:45 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] tools subcmd: Tighten the filename size in
check_if_command_finished
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 08:08:53 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> FILENAME_MAX is often PATH_MAX (4kb), far more than needed for the
> /proc path. Make the buffer size sufficient for the maximum integer
> plus "/proc/" and "/status" with a '\0' terminator.
>
>
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists