[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F998F71D-1244-4154-BC5F-19201C23BDBE@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 10:46:12 -0700
From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tracing: ipv6: Replace deprecated strcpy() with
strscpy()
Hi Steve,
On 14. Jul 2025, at 09:38, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Hmm, why is that string hard coded to 16 bytes and doesn't use the
> dynamic string facility? Perhaps something like this?
Your commit fca8300f68fe3 changed it from __dynamic_array() to __array()
and __string() seems to be just a special version of __dynamic_array()
with a length of -1.
In the commit description you wrote: "Since the size of the name is at
most 16 bytes (defined by IFNAMSIZ), it is not worth spending the effort
to determine the size of the string."
Thanks,
Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists