[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7387c4f3-d495-4f31-8222-27a782844473@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:40:34 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com
Cc: ziy@...dia.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
npache@...hat.com, ryan.roberts@....com, baohua@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] khugepaged: Optimize
__collapse_huge_page_copy_succeeded() by PTE batching
On 2025/7/22 23:05, Dev Jain wrote:
> Use PTE batching to optimize __collapse_huge_page_copy_succeeded().
>
> On arm64, suppose khugepaged is scanning a pte-mapped 2MB THP for collapse.
> Then, calling ptep_clear() for every pte will cause a TLB flush for every
> contpte block. Instead, clear_ptes() does a contpte_try_unfold_partial()
> which will flush the TLB only for the (if any) starting and ending contpte
> block, if they partially overlap with the range khugepaged is looking at.
>
> For all arches, there should be a benefit due to batching atomic operations
> on mapcounts due to folio_remove_rmap_ptes() and saving some calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
With David's comments addressed, LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists