linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/17] drm/msm/a6xx: Set Keep-alive votes to block IFPC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <s7ck5taxbozy3dxtav2huxh5d4ietfmqsv4mliajelu2gy4eqo@6xmp73eamqm7>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:53:00 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
        Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
        Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
        Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] drm/msm/a6xx: Set Keep-alive votes to block IFPC

On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 02:52:52AM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On 7/23/2025 3:35 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > On 7/22/25 11:24 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> >> On 7/22/2025 7:14 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 05:46:09PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> >>>> Set Keepalive votes at appropriate places to block IFPC power collapse
> >>>> until we access all the required registers. This is required during gpu
> >>>> IRQ handling and also during preemption.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>
> >>>> ---
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> >>>> +static void set_keepalive_vote(struct msm_gpu *gpu, bool on)
> >>>
> >>> a6xx_set_keepalive_vote()
> >>
> >> static fn! Why do we need prefix here?
> > 
> > It's good practice to namespace-prefix your functions, so that you
> > can more easily find them, e.g. in a backtrace.
> 
> It would be obvious from the parent functions in the backtrace, right?

Think about jumping to a tag, etc.

> 
> A bit subjective! I feel that the prefixes are unnecessary for small
> local helper fns. Prefix for *every* single routine in a source file
> makes the code look a little bit bloated.
> 
> -Akhil.
> 
> > 
> > For a prefix, adreno_gmu_ would be even better, as the register doesn't
> > seem to have changed across generations
> > 
> > Konrad
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry