lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5dd85103-23b6-46b8-9e13-f777692b9dbb@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 09:31:51 +0530
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: david@...hat.com, ziy@...dia.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
 lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, npache@...hat.com,
 ryan.roberts@....com, baohua@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mm: add get_and_clear_ptes() and clear_ptes()


On 23/07/25 2:17 am, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 20:35:57 +0530 Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com> wrote:
>
>> Let's add variants to be used where "full" does not apply -- which will
>> be the majority of cases in the future. "full" really only applies if
>> we are about to tear down a full MM.
>>
>> Use get_and_clear_ptes() in existing code, clear_ptes() users will
>> be added next.
>>
>> Should we make these inline functions instead and add separate docs?
> inlined functions would be preferable.
>
>> Probably not worth it for now.
> Well, as David has called for a v4 I suggest you make that change.
>
> Thanks, I'll queue the series in mm-new for a bit of testing.

Thanks. I'll post v4 later in the day.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ