linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 03/15] dt-bindings: display: sprd: allow attaching a DSI panel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250723-wine-numbat-of-persistence-bf43f3@kuoka>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 10:03:21 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Otto Pflüger <otto.pflueger@...cue.de>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, 
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, 
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, 
	Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>, Kevin Tang <kevin.tang@...soc.com>, 
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/15] dt-bindings: display: sprd: allow attaching a
 DSI panel

On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 09:54:57AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 04:41:05PM +0200, Otto Pflüger wrote:
> > +      port@1:
> > +        $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base
> > +        unevaluatedProperties: false
> > +        properties:
> > +          endpoint:
> > +            $ref: /schemas/media/video-interfaces.yaml#
> > +            unevaluatedProperties: false
> > +            description: The output endpoint, usually connected to the panel
> 
> I never remember if the output should be a "port" here or a panel@ child
> (as described by dsi-controller.yaml). Various users do it differently.
> 
> Syntax looks fine to me, so happy to get second opinion on above point.

I got now explanation from Neil, so all is fine.

> 
> Anyway:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>