linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 07/19] dt-bindings: memory: factorise LPDDR channel binding into memory channel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <221cbc67-6b23-4e68-b870-114742e6fa61@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 10:18:11 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Clement LE GOFFIC <clement.legoffic@...s.st.com>,
 Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>,
 Le Goffic <legoffic.clement@...il.com>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/19] dt-bindings: memory: factorise LPDDR channel
 binding into memory channel

On 23/07/2025 10:10, Clement LE GOFFIC wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On 7/23/25 08:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 04:03:24PM +0200, Clément Le Goffic wrote:
>>> LPDDR and DDR channels exist and share the same properties, they have a
>>> compatible, ranks, and an io-width.
>>
>> Maybe it is true for all types of SDRAM, like RDRAM and eDRAM, but I
>> don't think all memory types do.
>>
>> I think this should be renamed to sdram-channel.
> 
> Ok, do you want me to also the memory-props patch into sdram-props ?

Yes.

Best regards,
Krzysztof