[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aIA+lmqOMRtXTvsl@yuanjiey.ap.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 09:44:54 +0800
From: yuanjiey <yuanjie.yang@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@....qualcomm.com,
quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com, quic_yuanjiey@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Fix logic error when TLMM reg-names
property is missing
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 09:38:51AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 01:44:46PM +0800, yuanjie yang wrote:
> > From: Yuanjie Yang <yuanjie.yang@....qualcomm.com>
> >
> > Some Qualcomm platforms, such as sm8750.dtsi, define a single TLMM
> > region without the reg-names property. This is a valid and expected
> > configuration. However, the current code incorrectly treats the absence
> > of reg-names as an error, resulting in unintended behavior.
> >
> > Refactoring the logic to handle both cases correctly:
>
> s/Refactoring/Refactor/g
will update.
> > If only the gpio parameter is provided, default to TLMM region 0.
> > If both gpio and name are provided, compare the reg-names entries in the
> > TLMM node with the given name to select the appropriate region.
> >
> > This ensures proper handling of platforms with either single or multiple
> > TLMM regions.
>
> Drop this sentence.
will update.
> >
> > Fixes: 56ffb63749f4 ("pinctrl: qcom: add multi TLMM region option parameter")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuanjie Yang <yuanjie.yang@....qualcomm.com>
>
> No empty lines between the tags.
will update.
> > ---
> > drivers/pinctrl/qcom/tlmm-test.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/tlmm-test.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/tlmm-test.c
> > index 7d7fff538755..6de8cf23f9f0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/tlmm-test.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/tlmm-test.c
> > @@ -581,25 +581,25 @@ static int tlmm_reg_base(struct device_node *tlmm, struct resource *res)
> > int ret;
> > int i;
> >
> > - count = of_property_count_strings(tlmm, "reg-names");
> > - if (count <= 0) {
> > - pr_err("failed to find tlmm reg name\n");
> > - return count;
> > - }
> > -
> > - reg_names = kcalloc(count, sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!reg_names)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> > - ret = of_property_read_string_array(tlmm, "reg-names", reg_names, count);
> > - if (ret != count) {
> > - kfree(reg_names);
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > -
> > if (!strcmp(tlmm_reg_name, "default_region")) {
> > ret = of_address_to_resource(tlmm, 0, res);
>
> return here and remove braces around the else clause. It's strange that
> you didn't get the warning about calling kfree on the uninitialized
> variable.
Thanks, will remove braces and fix kfree issue.
> > } else {
> > + count = of_property_count_strings(tlmm, "reg-names");
> > + if (count <= 0) {
> > + pr_err("failed to find tlmm reg name\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + reg_names = kcalloc(count, sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!reg_names)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + ret = of_property_read_string_array(tlmm, "reg-names", reg_names, count);
> > + if (ret != count) {
> > + kfree(reg_names);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> > if (!strcmp(reg_names[i], tlmm_reg_name)) {
> > ret = of_address_to_resource(tlmm, i, res);
> >
> > base-commit: d086c886ceb9f59dea6c3a9dae7eb89e780a20c9
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
Thanks,
Yuanjie
Powered by blists - more mailing lists