[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nqujsfdojllp74ykhskftdgj6kcvje726av2bgu5xqymiwvzl3@mw2cqji4qzqc>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 14:27:46 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: yuanjie yang <yuanjie.yang@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@....qualcomm.com,
quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com, quic_yuanjiey@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: Fix logic error when TLMM reg-names
property is missing
On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 03:50:24PM +0800, yuanjie yang wrote:
> From: Yuanjie Yang <yuanjie.yang@....qualcomm.com>
>
> Some Qualcomm platforms, such as sm8750.dtsi, define a single TLMM
> region without the reg-names property. This is a valid and expected
> configuration. However, the current code incorrectly treats the absence
> of reg-names as an error, resulting in unintended behavior.
>
> Refactor the logic to handle both cases correctly:
> If only the gpio parameter is provided, default to TLMM region 0.
> If both gpio and name are provided, compare the reg-names entries in the
> TLMM node with the given name to select the appropriate region.
>
> Fixes: 56ffb63749f4 ("pinctrl: qcom: add multi TLMM region option parameter")
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuanjie Yang <yuanjie.yang@....qualcomm.com>
>
> ---
> - optimize commit message
> - optimize code structure and fix kfree issue
> - rebase on tag: next-20250723
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250722054446.3432-1-yuanjie.yang@oss.qualcomm.com/
>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/tlmm-test.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/tlmm-test.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/tlmm-test.c
> index 7d7fff538755..e41fe7e76c80 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/tlmm-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/tlmm-test.c
> @@ -581,10 +581,13 @@ static int tlmm_reg_base(struct device_node *tlmm, struct resource *res)
> int ret;
> int i;
>
> + if (!strcmp(tlmm_reg_name, "default_region"))
> + return of_address_to_resource(tlmm, 0, res);
> +
> count = of_property_count_strings(tlmm, "reg-names");
> if (count <= 0) {
> pr_err("failed to find tlmm reg name\n");
> - return count;
> + return -EINVAL;
Why? It's better to propagate the error instead of reinventing it.
> }
>
> reg_names = kcalloc(count, sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -597,19 +600,16 @@ static int tlmm_reg_base(struct device_node *tlmm, struct resource *res)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if (!strcmp(tlmm_reg_name, "default_region")) {
> - ret = of_address_to_resource(tlmm, 0, res);
> - } else {
> - for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> - if (!strcmp(reg_names[i], tlmm_reg_name)) {
> - ret = of_address_to_resource(tlmm, i, res);
> - break;
> - }
> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> + if (!strcmp(reg_names[i], tlmm_reg_name)) {
> + ret = of_address_to_resource(tlmm, i, res);
> + break;
> }
> - if (i == count)
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + if (i == count)
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> kfree(reg_names);
>
> return ret;
>
> base-commit: a933d3dc1968fcfb0ab72879ec304b1971ed1b9a
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists