[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <789725BF-8D13-4334-A498-F2C51B546B6F@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 09:11:41 -0300
From: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Clean up Rust LockClassKey
Hi Alice,
> On 23 Jul 2025, at 08:49, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> This series applies the suggestion from Benno [1] and various other
> improvements I found when looking over the LockClassKey implementation.
>
> Based on rust-next.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/DBIJLR7XNI6U.21PMPODHE83DZ@kernel.org/
>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
> ---
> Alice Ryhl (2):
> rust: sync: refactor static_lock_class!() macro
> rust: sync: clean up LockClassKey and its docs
>
> rust/kernel/sync.rs | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: dff64b072708ffef23c117fa1ee1ea59eb417807
> change-id: 20250723-lock-class-key-cleanup-a3baf53b123a
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
>
>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
— Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists