linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add Glymur pinctrl bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e3d04cf8-6d9c-4514-9d8f-782e2d1505a7@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 18:36:31 +0530
From: Pankaj Patil <pankaj.patil@....qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, quic_rjendra@...cinc.com
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add Glymur pinctrl
 bindings

On 7/23/2025 6:23 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 7/23/25 2:07 PM, Pankaj Patil wrote:
>> On 7/23/2025 5:25 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 7/23/25 1:48 PM, Pankaj Patil wrote:
>>>> On 7/23/2025 5:10 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>> On 7/23/25 12:36 PM, Pankaj Patil wrote:
>>>>>> Add DeviceTree binding for Glymur SoC TLMM block
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Patil <pankaj.patil@....qualcomm.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>> +      function:
>>>>>> +        description:
>>>>>> +          Specify the alternative function to be configured for the specified
>>>>>> +          pins.
>>>>>> +        enum: [ gpio, RESOUT_GPIO_N, aoss_cti, asc_cci, atest_char, atest_usb,
>>>>> Any reason for           /\ to be uppercase?
>>>>>
>>>>> Konrad
>>>>>
>>>> glymur_functions enum members fetched from ipcat,
>>>> this does not exist for sm8750.
>>> I'll repeat my question
>>>
>>> Konrad
>> It's in uppercase because of the way it's in the driver,
>> I'll update only the bindings to lowercase and repost.
> No, the driver must obey to bindings. That's what they're for.
>
> This value is only used between the OS and DT, so it doesn't matter if
> the docs refer to it in uppercase, so long as you keep both in sync.
>
> Konrad
Okay,
Yes both driver and bindings are in sync.