[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <175327842469.2144459.7995862129200440475.robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:47:05 -0500
From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
To: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Yao Zi <ziyao@...root.org>, Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: gpio: rockchip: Allow use of a
power-domain
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:56:43 +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> The GPIO controllers in most Rockchip SoCs are part of power domains
> that are always powered on, i.e. PD_BUS or PD_PMU. These always powered
> on power domains have typically not been described in the device tree.
>
> Because these power domains have been left out of the device tree there
> has not been any real need to properly describe the GPIO controllers
> power domain.
>
> On RK3528 the GPIO controllers are spread out among the described
> PD_RKVENC, PD_VO and PD_VPU power domains. However, one GPIO controller
> belong to an undescribed always powered on power domain.
>
> Add support to describe an optional power-domains for the GPIO
> controllers in Rockchip SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
> ---
> v2: Update commit message
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists