lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=VBdzEAUHDSOfV4rTKrw6+fdtrAz-mxQwpYxdicUzGoVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 16:08:58 +0200
From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: quic_jiangenj@...cinc.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>, 
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, 
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, 
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] kcov: factor out struct kcov_state

> > -       /* Buffer for coverage collection: */
> > -       void                            *kcov_area;
> > +       /* kcov buffer state for this task. */
>
> For consistency: s/kcov/KCOV/
Ack


> >         if (data->saved_kcov) {
> > -               kcov_start(t, data->saved_kcov, data->saved_size,
> > -                          data->saved_area, data->saved_mode,
> > -                          data->saved_sequence);
> > -               data->saved_mode = 0;
> > -               data->saved_size = 0;
> > -               data->saved_area = NULL;
> > -               data->saved_sequence = 0;
> > +               kcov_start(t, data->saved_kcov, t->kcov_mode,
>
> We used to pass data->saved_mode, now we pass t->kcov_mode.
> Are they the same here? This makes me a bit nervous.

Thanks for noticing! I'll fix this one in v3.



> > -       kcov_start(t, kcov, size, area, mode, sequence);
> > +       kcov_start(t, kcov, t->kcov_mode, &state);
>
> We used to pass kcov->mode here, now it's t->kcov_mode.
> Are they the same here? I would prefer to restore the current version,
> if there is no specific reason to change it.

Ditto.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ