[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiDSCvvAX27u4_qnKxbSqWVWybsZFV-367eSv8ig85-cCeDTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 17:41:06 +0200
From: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: uvcvideo: Drop stream->mutex
Hi Laurent
On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 at 14:08, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 07:56:45AM +0000, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > Since commit c93d73c9c2cf ("media: uvcvideo: Use vb2 ioctl and fop
> > helpers"), the IOCTLs are serialized. Due to this there is no more need
> > to protect ctrl, cur_format or cur_frame from concurrent access.
> >
> > Drop stream->mutex after thanking it for years of good service.
> >
> > Use this opportunity to do fix some CodeStyle.
>
> Is that about the following change only:
>
> - if (format == NULL || frame == NULL) {
> + if (!format || !frame)
>
> or is there something else I missed ?
I believe that's it.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c | 4 ----
> > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_metadata.c | 8 ++------
> > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c | 39 ++++++++----------------------------
> > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h | 6 ------
> > 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c
> > index 775bede0d93d9b3e5391914aa395326d3de6a3b1..3039e6a533b82dd917050d416c9ced8756d69170 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c
> > @@ -183,8 +183,6 @@ static void uvc_stream_delete(struct uvc_streaming *stream)
> > if (stream->async_wq)
> > destroy_workqueue(stream->async_wq);
> >
> > - mutex_destroy(&stream->mutex);
> > -
> > usb_put_intf(stream->intf);
> >
> > kfree(stream->formats);
> > @@ -201,8 +199,6 @@ static struct uvc_streaming *uvc_stream_new(struct uvc_device *dev,
> > if (stream == NULL)
> > return NULL;
> >
> > - mutex_init(&stream->mutex);
> > -
> > stream->dev = dev;
> > stream->intf = usb_get_intf(intf);
> > stream->intfnum = intf->cur_altsetting->desc.bInterfaceNumber;
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_metadata.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_metadata.c
> > index 229e08ff323eed9129d835b24ea2e8085bb713b8..d1d4fade634bd3f8b12bbaa75388db42aecc25ea 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_metadata.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_metadata.c
> > @@ -100,14 +100,10 @@ static int uvc_meta_v4l2_set_format(struct file *file, void *fh,
> > * Metadata buffers would still be perfectly parseable, but it's more
> > * consistent and cleaner to disallow that.
> > */
> > - mutex_lock(&stream->mutex);
> > -
> > if (vb2_is_busy(&stream->meta.queue.queue))
> > - ret = -EBUSY;
> > - else
> > - stream->meta.format = fmt->dataformat;
> > + return -EBUSY;
> >
> > - mutex_unlock(&stream->mutex);
> > + stream->meta.format = fmt->dataformat;
> >
> > return ret;
>
> return 0;
>
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > index 160f9cf6e6dbdbf39e3eff56a5d5ea1d977fbe22..d7be4d59f0c73b983aa01321f4acc8f8bf6e83ef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > @@ -329,14 +329,12 @@ static int uvc_v4l2_try_format(struct uvc_streaming *stream,
> > * developers test their webcams with the Linux driver as well as with
> > * the Windows driver).
> > */
> > - mutex_lock(&stream->mutex);
> > if (stream->dev->quirks & UVC_QUIRK_PROBE_EXTRAFIELDS)
> > probe->dwMaxVideoFrameSize =
> > stream->ctrl.dwMaxVideoFrameSize;
> >
> > /* Probe the device. */
> > ret = uvc_probe_video(stream, probe);
> > - mutex_unlock(&stream->mutex);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > @@ -395,19 +393,15 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_g_fmt(struct file *file, void *fh,
> > struct uvc_streaming *stream = handle->stream;
> > const struct uvc_format *format;
> > const struct uvc_frame *frame;
> > - int ret = 0;
> >
> > if (fmt->type != stream->type)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&stream->mutex);
> > format = stream->cur_format;
> > frame = stream->cur_frame;
> >
> > - if (format == NULL || frame == NULL) {
> > - ret = -EINVAL;
> > - goto done;
> > - }
> > + if (!format || !frame)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > fmt->fmt.pix.pixelformat = format->fcc;
> > fmt->fmt.pix.width = frame->wWidth;
> > @@ -419,9 +413,7 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_g_fmt(struct file *file, void *fh,
> > fmt->fmt.pix.xfer_func = format->xfer_func;
> > fmt->fmt.pix.ycbcr_enc = format->ycbcr_enc;
> >
> > -done:
> > - mutex_unlock(&stream->mutex);
> > - return ret;
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int uvc_ioctl_s_fmt(struct file *file, void *fh,
> > @@ -441,19 +433,14 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_s_fmt(struct file *file, void *fh,
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&stream->mutex);
> > - if (vb2_is_busy(&stream->queue.queue)) {
> > - ret = -EBUSY;
> > - goto done;
> > - }
> > + if (vb2_is_busy(&stream->queue.queue))
> > + return -EBUSY;
> >
> > stream->ctrl = probe;
> > stream->cur_format = format;
> > stream->cur_frame = frame;
> >
> > -done:
> > - mutex_unlock(&stream->mutex);
> > - return ret;
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int uvc_ioctl_g_parm(struct file *file, void *fh,
> > @@ -466,9 +453,7 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_g_parm(struct file *file, void *fh,
> > if (parm->type != stream->type)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&stream->mutex);
> > numerator = stream->ctrl.dwFrameInterval;
> > - mutex_unlock(&stream->mutex);
> >
>
> You can drop the blank line here.
>
> > denominator = 10000000;
> > v4l2_simplify_fraction(&numerator, &denominator, 8, 333);
> > @@ -519,12 +504,9 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_s_parm(struct file *file, void *fh,
> > uvc_dbg(stream->dev, FORMAT, "Setting frame interval to %u/%u (%u)\n",
> > timeperframe.numerator, timeperframe.denominator, interval);
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&stream->mutex);
> >
>
> Double blank line.
>
> > - if (uvc_queue_streaming(&stream->queue)) {
> > - mutex_unlock(&stream->mutex);
> > + if (uvc_queue_streaming(&stream->queue))
> > return -EBUSY;
> > - }
> >
> > format = stream->cur_format;
> > frame = stream->cur_frame;
> > @@ -556,14 +538,11 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_s_parm(struct file *file, void *fh,
> >
> > /* Probe the device with the new settings. */
> > ret = uvc_probe_video(stream, &probe);
> > - if (ret < 0) {
> > - mutex_unlock(&stream->mutex);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> > - }
> >
> > stream->ctrl = probe;
> > stream->cur_frame = frame;
> > - mutex_unlock(&stream->mutex);
> >
> > /* Return the actual frame period. */
> > timeperframe.numerator = probe.dwFrameInterval;
> > @@ -941,10 +920,8 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_g_selection(struct file *file, void *fh,
> >
> > sel->r.left = 0;
> > sel->r.top = 0;
> > - mutex_lock(&stream->mutex);
> > sel->r.width = stream->cur_frame->wWidth;
> > sel->r.height = stream->cur_frame->wHeight;
> > - mutex_unlock(&stream->mutex);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> > index 757254fc4fe930ae61c9d0425f04d4cd074a617e..86765b9d7935f0888476249c3fb826cd7f36b35c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> > @@ -469,12 +469,6 @@ struct uvc_streaming {
> > const struct uvc_format *cur_format;
> > const struct uvc_frame *cur_frame;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Protect access to ctrl, cur_format, cur_frame and hardware video
> > - * probe control.
> > - */
> > - struct mutex mutex;
> > -
>
> Could you please instead keep this mutex and drop uvc_video_queue.mutex
> ? The rationale is that the same lock is now used to protect the queue
> operations and to serialize the ioctls. It's therefore a higher-level
> lock, which should be stored in the higher-level object, not in the
> queue.
>
> You can then also drop the lock assignment in uvc_queue.c that reads
>
> queue->queue.lock = &queue->mutex;
>
> as videobuf2 and the V4L2 core will use the video device lock when no
> queue lock is set. The comment at the top of uvc_queue.c may need to be
> updated.
Are we sure that it is exactly the same?
There are places in videobuf2-core.c where we do not use video device lock.
Eg:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c#n2056
I'd rather keep the assignment to be in the safe side.
Regards!
>
> > /* Buffers queue. */
> > unsigned int frozen : 1;
> > struct uvc_video_queue queue;
> >
> > ---
> > base-commit: d968e50b5c26642754492dea23cbd3592bde62d8
> > change-id: 20250716-uvc-onelocksless-b66658e01f89
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
--
Ricardo Ribalda
Powered by blists - more mailing lists