[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72n31LBnLdAtZH0VBzVGau-ddWCp=5=Bra=boRE4RiCZGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 17:55:03 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@....qualcomm.com>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add initial interconnect (icc_path) Rust abstractions
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 2:36 PM Konrad Dybcio
<konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> Regarding the users, I don't have any specific promises on a consumer
> of these abstractions in a short term, although the ICC API is rather
> common (especially across the major arm-based SoCs), so it shouldn't be
> long before someone needs it.
In general, abstractions cannot be added unless there is a known user
that is coming upstream (or developed in-tree over time, like Nova and
Tyr).
There is also the "Rust reference driver" approach/exception to help C
maintainers bootstrap the Rust side, which you may be able to take
advantage of:
https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-reference-drivers
At the end of the day, it depends on the particular case and the
maintainers, of course.
I hope that helps.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists