linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: remove io-mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee6df343-6500-4443-9af1-4d15040e39c9@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 18:16:11 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
 "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: remove io-mapping

On 24.07.25 17:39, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> Sorry Andrew please ignore this for now, I'll send a v2 later.
> 
> I'm not having a great day here...
> 
> I wrongly assumed that, since this is wholly unused in practice, that nobody
> would refer to it or include the header, but it turns out that's incorrect.

So, do we have to keep all (and keep it in MAINTAINERS) or is it just 
about cleaning up the headers?

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb