[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20fad5dc-b0c7-4f16-b8ad-5f8ddceacfc0@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:38:00 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Shivendra Pratap <shivendra.pratap@....qualcomm.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Souvik Chakravarty <Souvik.Chakravarty@....com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@....qualcomm.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, André Draszik
<andre.draszik@...aro.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>,
Elliot Berman <elliot.berman@....qualcomm.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/8] Implement vendor resets for PSCI SYSTEM_RESET2
On 7/24/25 07:43, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025, at 16:04, Shivendra Pratap wrote:
>> On 7/24/2025 6:18 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 24/07/2025 14:24, Shivendra Pratap wrote:
>
>>> I strongly insist using compatible as way to find your device, not node
>>> names.
>> It will look better to switch to compatible. Will define a compatible for
>> psci reboot-mode binding and align the patch to use the compatible for sysfs.
>> Current patch defines reboot-mode as a property to psci, hope its fine to
>> define a compatible for this property like "psci-vendor-reset" or
>> "psci-reboot-modes"?
>>
>
> How about using the reboot driver name as the identifier in sysfs
> instead of the compatible string? That would make it independent of
> devicetree.
+1
>
> I had a related idea to provide some namespacing on the actual
> reboot syscall parameter, as we have two (or more) orthogonal
> concepts here, when there is more than one reboot driver and
> drivers support multiple modes.
>
> E.g. you could use
>
> syscall(__NR_reboot, LINUX_REBOOT_MAGIC1, LINUX_REBOOT_MAGIC2,
> LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_RESTART2, "watchdog");
>
> vs
>
> syscall(__NR_reboot, LINUX_REBOOT_MAGIC1, LINUX_REBOOT_MAGIC2,
> LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_RESTART2, "psci");
>
> to pick one of the drivers, or
>
> syscall(__NR_reboot, LINUX_REBOOT_MAGIC1, LINUX_REBOOT_MAGIC2,
> LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_RESTART2, "bootloader");
>
> syscall(__NR_reboot, LINUX_REBOOT_MAGIC1, LINUX_REBOOT_MAGIC2,
> LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_RESTART2, "recovery");
>
> to ask for a reboot from any driver that supports a mode, or
> combine the two and ask a specific mode in a specific driver like
>
> syscall(__NR_reboot, LINUX_REBOOT_MAGIC1, LINUX_REBOOT_MAGIC2,
> LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_RESTART2, "psci:bootloader");
Yes that seems entirely adequate as well.
If there is a single reboot driver registered say "psci" then you could
go with the short hand of specifying "bootloader" which would be
functionally equivalent to "psci:bootloader". That is, the driver name
becomes optional. This would maintain user-space compatibility with
existing systems that already support custom reboot modes.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists