linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] tools/verification: Improvements to rv and rvgen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <735d8530-f733-4973-8b0d-ac601d0a1799@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 18:07:35 +0000 (UTC)
From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>,
	Tomas Glozar <tglozar@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <jlelli@...hat.com>,
	Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] tools/verification: Improvements to rv and rvgen

2025-07-24T14:40:23Z Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>:

> On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 18:12:35 +0200
> Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> This series introduces various improvements to the rv/rvgen tools as
>> first posted in [1]. It also adapts generated kernel files accordingly.
>>
> So keeping tools and kernel separate for RV is proving to be quite a
> pain as patch 4 has conflicts. I'm going to make a third topic branch
> just for RV. This will include anything in tools/verification and
> kernel/trace/rv. I'll restructure the patches I already added and move
> them into this branch, so that all the RV related work is there and not
> in the latency or tools branches.
>
> So no need to separate RV into kernel and tooling anymore.
>

Alright, but I guess going forward I'll try to keep changes separated anyway, if possible.

Right, 4 is problematic here, it should apply cleanly on next though, maybe I should have rebased on your tree instead..

So do I submit together 4,5 and the kernel ones? Or again all together?

Thanks,
Gabriele

> The topic branches I'll have is:
>
> tools - for things like rtla
> latency - for the latency tracers (osnoise, etc)
> rv - for the runtime verification work.