[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c64a1962-0c6c-4685-af60-78df6b39d6bd@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:42:30 -0500
From: "Naik, Avadhut" <avadnaik@....com>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Cc: linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, bp@...en8.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] EDAC/amd64: Add support for AMD family 1Ah-based newer models
On 7/24/2025 08:24, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 07:27:31PM +0000, Avadhut Naik wrote:
>> Add support for family 1Ah-based models 50h-57h, 90h-9Fh, A0h-AFh, and
>> C0h-C7h.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
>> index 07f1e9dc1ca7..06ae6750ca14 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
>> @@ -3923,6 +3923,26 @@ static int per_family_init(struct amd64_pvt *pvt)
>> pvt->ctl_name = "F1Ah_M40h";
>> pvt->flags.zn_regs_v2 = 1;
>> break;
>> + case 0x50 ... 0x57:
>> + pvt->ctl_name = "F1Ah_M50h";
>> + pvt->max_mcs = 16;
>> + pvt->flags.zn_regs_v2 = 1;
>> + break;
>> + case 0x90 ... 0x9f:
>> + pvt->ctl_name = "F1Ah_M90h";
>> + pvt->max_mcs = 8;
>> + pvt->flags.zn_regs_v2 = 1;
>> + break;
>> + case 0xa0 ... 0xaf:
>> + pvt->ctl_name = "F1Ah_MA0h";
>> + pvt->max_mcs = 8;
>> + pvt->flags.zn_regs_v2 = 1;
>> + break;
>> + case 0xc0 ... 0xc7:
>> + pvt->ctl_name = "F1Ah_MC0h";
>> + pvt->max_mcs = 16;
>
> These last three groups have extra tabs. Please align them with the
> other lines.
>
Yes, will do!
>> + pvt->flags.zn_regs_v2 = 1;
>> + break;
>> }
>> break;
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
>> index 17228d07de4c..d70b8a8d0b09 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
>> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
>> /* Hardware limit on ChipSelect rows per MC and processors per system */
>> #define NUM_CHIPSELECTS 8
>> #define DRAM_RANGES 8
>> -#define NUM_CONTROLLERS 12
>> +#define NUM_CONTROLLERS 16
>
> The "legacy sysfs interface" needs an update too. I don't know if folks
> still actively use it, but it hasn't been totally removed yet.
>
> See this commit as an example:
> 25836ce1df82 ("EDAC/mc_sysfs: Increase legacy channel support to 12")
>
Okay. Will update the sysfs interface too!
> Thanks,
> Yazen
--
Thanks,
Avadhut Naik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists