[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250724195913.60742-1-ImanDevel@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 15:59:13 -0400
From: Seyediman Seyedarab <imandevel@...il.com>
To: lyude@...hat.com,
dakr@...nel.org,
airlied@...il.com,
simona@...ll.ch
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Seyediman Seyedarab <ImanDevel@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: replace snprintf() with scnprintf() in nvkm_snprintbf()
snprintf() returns the number of characters that *would* have been
written, which can overestimate how much you actually wrote to the
buffer in case of truncation. That leads to 'data += this' advancing
the pointer past the end of the buffer and size going negative.
Switching to scnprintf() prevents potential buffer overflows and ensures
consistent behavior when building the output string.
Signed-off-by: Seyediman Seyedarab <ImanDevel@...il.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/enum.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/enum.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/enum.c
index b9581feb24cc..a23b40b27b81 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/enum.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/enum.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ nvkm_snprintbf(char *data, int size, const struct nvkm_bitfield *bf, u32 value)
bool space = false;
while (size >= 1 && bf->name) {
if (value & bf->mask) {
- int this = snprintf(data, size, "%s%s",
+ int this = scnprintf(data, size, "%s%s",
space ? " " : "", bf->name);
size -= this;
data += this;
--
2.50.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists