[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87jz3ykpju.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:37:09 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
Cc: andrzej.hajda@...el.com,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
rfoss@...nel.org,
Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
jonas@...boo.se,
jernej.skrabec@...il.com,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
mripard@...nel.org,
tzimmermann@...e.de,
airlied@...il.com,
simona@...ll.ch,
lumag@...nel.org,
dianders@...omium.org,
cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com,
luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
victor.liu@....com,
shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
kernel@...gutronix.de,
festevam@...il.com,
imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
l.stach@...gutronix.de,
shengjiu.wang@...il.com,
perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.com,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] ALSA: Add definitions for the bits in IEC958 subframe
On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:22:44 +0200,
Shengjiu Wang wrote:
>
> The IEC958 subframe format SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_IEC958_SUBFRAME_LE are used
> in HDMI and DisplayPort to describe the audio stream, but hardware device
> may need to reorder the IEC958 bits for internal transmission, so need
> these standard bits definitions for IEC958 subframe format.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
> ---
> include/sound/asoundef.h | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/sound/asoundef.h b/include/sound/asoundef.h
> index 09b2c3dffb30..7efd61568636 100644
> --- a/include/sound/asoundef.h
> +++ b/include/sound/asoundef.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,15 @@
> * Digital audio interface *
> * *
> ****************************************************************************/
> +/* IEC958 subframe format */
> +#define IEC958_SUBFRAME_PREAMBLE_MASK (0xf)
> +#define IEC958_SUBFRAME_AUXILIARY_MASK (0xf<<4)
> +#define IEC958_SUBFRAME_SAMPLE_24_MASK (0xffffff<<4)
> +#define IEC958_SUBFRAME_SAMPLE_20_MASK (0xfffff<<8)
> +#define IEC958_SUBFRAME_VALIDITY (0x1<<28)
> +#define IEC958_SUBFRAME_USER_DATA (0x1<<29)
> +#define IEC958_SUBFRAME_CHANNEL_STATUS (0x1<<30)
> +#define IEC958_SUBFRAME_PARITY (0x1<<31)
I'd use "U" suffix as it can reach to the MSB.
Also, you can put spaces around the operators to align with the
standard format, too. I guess you followed to the other code there,
but following to the standard coding style would be better.
With those addressed, feel free to take my ack for this patch:
Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
thanks,
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists