linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] memory: mtk-smi: mt8188: Add SMI reset and clamp for MT8188

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <03dece78-44d5-4b85-b71c-bb6794849ddd@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 10:55:29 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Friday Yang (杨阳) <Friday.Yang@...iatek.com>,
 "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
 "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 Yong Wu (吴勇) <Yong.Wu@...iatek.com>,
 "p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
 "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
 <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] memory: mtk-smi: mt8188: Add SMI reset and clamp
 for MT8188

On 24/07/2025 10:43, Friday Yang (杨阳) wrote:
>>
>>> ignore this tag. What I intended to explain here was that I decided
>>> not
>>> to use 'devm_pm_runtime_enable' to replace 'pm_runtime_enable'
>>> functions. Unfortunately, the fake tag didn't explain this clearly
>>> in
>>> the changelog, which was my fault. To address this, I updated
>>> patchset
>>> v8 to include an explanation.
>>>
>>> In patchset v6, I replaced 'pm_runtime_enable' with
>>> 'devm_pm_runtime_enable'. However, in patchset v8, I reverted this
>>> change and included the reason for this decision in the changelog.
>>> Apologize for the delay and the trouble again.
>>
>> Nothing above is related to my question about the
>> fake/invented/questioned tag.
>>
> 
> I got your point, you refer to the 'reviewed-by' and 'acked-by' tag in
> this patch.
> These are the tags from two reviewers.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/174172361378.44650.15345202042780383326.robh@kernel.org/


You are really not responding to my initial comments and keep dragging
this discussion in some confused directions. Do we talk here about that
patch? No.

Best regards,
Krzysztof