[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4c00e80-5f1e-47d2-ad49-80343668ac3f@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 11:10:22 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, robh@...nel.org
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, chunkuang.hu@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de, jassisinghbrar@...il.com,
mchehab@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com, chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com,
vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, sean.wang@...nel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, atenart@...nel.org, jitao.shi@...iatek.com,
ck.hu@...iatek.com, houlong.wei@...iatek.com,
kyrie.wu@...iatek.corp-partner.google.com, andy.teng@...iatek.com,
tinghan.shen@...iatek.com, jiaxin.yu@...iatek.com, shane.chien@...iatek.com,
olivia.wen@...iatek.com, granquet@...libre.com, eugen.hristev@...aro.org,
arnd@...db.de, sam.shih@...iatek.com, jieyy.yang@...iatek.com,
frank-w@...lic-files.de, mwalle@...nel.org, fparent@...libre.com,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/38] dt-bindings: crypto: inside-secure,safexcel:
Mandate only ring IRQs
On 24/07/2025 10:38, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Not all IP implementations of EIP97 and EIP197 have the EIP and
> MEM interrupts hooked up to the SoC, and those are not required
> for functionality as status for both can be polled (and anyway
> there's even no real need to poll, but that's another story).
>
> As an example of this, the MediaTek MT7968A and MT7986B SoCs do
> not have those two interrupts hooked up to their irq controlller.
>
> For this reason, make the EIP and MEM interrupt optional.
>
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> ---
Same comments as for Aleksander patch doing the same. You solved second
part of them, but first - missing SoC compatibles - needs to be addressed.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists