linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] drm/panthor: Add support for Mali-G710, Mali-G510 and Mali-G310

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <28500b47-6492-4bd6-a342-b21673948868@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 12:00:03 +0100
From: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
To: Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@....com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: nd@....com, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
 Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] drm/panthor: Add support for Mali-G710, Mali-G510
 and Mali-G310

On 24/07/2025 10:25, Karunika Choo wrote:
> This patch adds GPU model name and FW binary support for Mali-G710,
> Mali-G510, and Mali-G310.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c | 2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_hw.c | 6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c
> index 36f1034839c2..b7b454d16f12 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c
> @@ -1402,3 +1402,5 @@ int panthor_fw_init(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
>  }
>  
>  MODULE_FIRMWARE("arm/mali/arch10.8/mali_csffw.bin");
> +MODULE_FIRMWARE("arm/mali/arch10.10/mali_csffw.bin");
> +MODULE_FIRMWARE("arm/mali/arch10.12/mali_csffw.bin");
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_hw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_hw.c
> index f39010c0ca86..7f138974d43b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_hw.c
> @@ -15,8 +15,14 @@ static char *get_gpu_model_name(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
>  						GPU_PROD_MAJOR(gpu_id));
>  
>  	switch (product_id) {
> +	case GPU_PROD_ID_MAKE(10, 2):
> +		return "Mali-G710";
>  	case GPU_PROD_ID_MAKE(10, 7):
>  		return "Mali-G610";
> +	case GPU_PROD_ID_MAKE(10, 3):
> +		return "Mali-G510";
> +	case GPU_PROD_ID_MAKE(10, 4):
> +		return "Mali-G310";

Chia-I Wu pointed out these don't appear to have any logical ordering.
I'd suggest ordering by arch major/product major.

With that fixed:
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>

>  	}
>  
>  	return "(Unknown Mali GPU)";