lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eeec8f7d96b9dd9482a314b8ed81d3e26f6f6b9d.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 11:37:49 +0000
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "pbonzini@...hat.com"
	<pbonzini@...hat.com>, "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Gao, Chao"
	<chao.gao@...el.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "seanjc@...gle.com"
	<seanjc@...gle.com>
CC: "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>, "Edgecombe, Rick P"
	<rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
	"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "hpa@...or.com"
	<hpa@...or.com>, "john.allen@....com" <john.allen@....com>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "tglx@...utronix.de"
	<tglx@...utronix.de>, "minipli@...ecurity.net" <minipli@...ecurity.net>,
	"mlevitsk@...hat.com" <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, "xin@...or.com" <xin@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 01/23] KVM: x86: Rename kvm_{g,s}et_msr()* to show
 that they emulate guest accesses

On Fri, 2025-07-04 at 01:49 -0700, Chao Gao wrote:
> From: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
> 
> Rename kvm_{g,s}et_msr()* to kvm_emulate_msr_{read,write}()* to make it
> more obvious that KVM uses these helpers to emulate guest behaviors,
> i.e., host_initiated == false in these helpers.
> 
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> Suggested-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>

Nit: I don't think your Reviewed-by is needed if the chain already has
your SoB?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ