linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: mention MIT license as a compatible license with GPLv2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025072411-provable-frying-9a53@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:47:29 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: mention MIT license as a compatible license with
 GPLv2

On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 04:11:57PM +0530, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >> +versions of the GPL), the three-clause BSD license or the MIT license.
> > 
> > You forgot a ',' anyway :(
> 
> While it is no longer relevant, I wonder where you wanted the comma. Maybe you meant "the three-clause BSD license, or the MIT license"?

Yup!