[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5a0fcf9-4ae0-4d0a-842e-d9475997cdb5@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:59:04 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Victor Shih <victorshihgli@...il.com>, <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<benchuanggli@...il.com>, <ben.chuang@...esyslogic.com.tw>,
<HL.Liu@...esyslogic.com.tw>, Victor Shih <victor.shih@...esyslogic.com.tw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] mmc: sdhci-pci-gli: GL9763e: Mask the replay timer
timeout of AER
On 16/07/2025 13:43, Victor Shih wrote:
> From: Victor Shih <victor.shih@...esyslogic.com.tw>
>
> Due to a flaw in the hardware design, the GL9763e replay timer frequently
> times out when ASPM is enabled. As a result, the warning messages will
> often appear in the system log when the system accesses the GL9763e
> PCI config. Therefore, the replay timer timeout must be masked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Victor Shih <victor.shih@...esyslogic.com.tw>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
> index 4c2ae71770f7..eb3954729a3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
> @@ -1754,6 +1754,7 @@ static int gl9763e_add_host(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
> static void gli_set_gl9763e(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = slot->chip->pdev;
> + int aer;
> u32 value;
>
> pci_read_config_dword(pdev, PCIE_GLI_9763E_VHS, &value);
> @@ -1780,6 +1781,14 @@ static void gli_set_gl9763e(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
> value |= FIELD_PREP(GLI_9763E_HS400_RXDLY, GLI_9763E_HS400_RXDLY_5);
> pci_write_config_dword(pdev, PCIE_GLI_9763E_CLKRXDLY, value);
>
> + /* mask the replay timer timeout of AER */
> + aer = pci_find_ext_capability(pdev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ERR);
> + if (aer) {
> + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, aer + PCI_ERR_COR_MASK, &value);
> + value |= PCI_ERR_COR_REP_TIMER;
> + pci_write_config_dword(pdev, aer + PCI_ERR_COR_MASK, value);
> + }
The same code is in gl9750_hw_setting() and gl9755_hw_setting()
so it could be a separate little function.
Also should gli_set_gl9763e() be renamed gl9763e_hw_setting() for
consistency?
Also should this have a fixes tag?
> +
> pci_read_config_dword(pdev, PCIE_GLI_9763E_VHS, &value);
> value &= ~GLI_9763E_VHS_REV;
> value |= FIELD_PREP(GLI_9763E_VHS_REV, GLI_9763E_VHS_REV_R);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists