[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <175346932984.1444596.3658930443325277654.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 11:48:49 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>, Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] Fixes for Intel TMA, particularly for hybrid
On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 20:05:02 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On hybrid systems some PMUs apply to all core types, particularly for
> metrics the msr PMU and the tsc event. The metrics often only want the
> values of the counter for their specific core type. These patches
> allow the cpu term in an event to give a PMU name to take the cpumask
> from. For example:
>
> $ perf stat -e msr/tsc,cpu=cpu_atom/ ...
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists