linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/2] Add AI coding assistant configuration to Linux kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250725150046.3adb556c@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 15:00:46 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kees@...nel.org,
 konstantin@...uxfoundation.org, corbet@....net, josh@...htriplett.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] Add AI coding assistant configuration to Linux kernel

On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 11:41:14 -0700
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:53:56 -0400 Sasha Levin wrote:
> > 	Co-developed-by: Claude claude-opus-4-20250514
> > 	---
> > 	 Documentation/power/opp.rst | 2 +-
> > 	 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)  
> 
> I think we should suggest that the tag is under --- ?
> It's only relevant during the review. Once the patch is committed 
> whether the code was organic or generated by Corp XYZ's Banana AI
> is just free advertising..

What's the difference between that and others using their corporate email?
I even add (Google) to my SoB to denote who is paying me to do the work.

Also, I would argue that it would be useful in the change log as if there's
a bug in the generated code, you know who or *what* to blame. Especially if
there is a pattern to be found.

-- Steve