[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250725194936.GA1731993-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 14:49:36 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-pou@...s.st.com>
Cc: Yannick Fertre <yannick.fertre@...s.st.com>,
Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@...s.st.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Christophe Roullier <christophe.roullier@...s.st.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] dt-bindings: display: st: add new compatible to
LTDC device
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 12:03:53PM +0200, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
> The new STMicroelectronics SoC features a display controller similar to
> the one used in previous SoCs. Because there is additional registers,
> it is incompatible with existing IPs.
>
> Add the new name to the list of compatible string.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-pou@...s.st.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-ltdc.yaml | 37 +++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-ltdc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-ltdc.yaml
> index d6ea4d62a2cfae26353c9f20a326a4329fed3a2f..546f57cb7a402b82e868aa05f874c65b8da19444 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-ltdc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-ltdc.yaml
> @@ -12,7 +12,9 @@ maintainers:
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - const: st,stm32-ltdc
> + enum:
> + - st,stm32-ltdc
> + - st,stm32mp25-ltdc
>
> reg:
> maxItems: 1
> @@ -24,11 +26,12 @@ properties:
> minItems: 1
>
> clocks:
> - maxItems: 1
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 4
>
> clock-names:
> - items:
> - - const: lcd
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 4
>
> resets:
> maxItems: 1
> @@ -51,6 +54,32 @@ required:
> - resets
> - port
>
> +if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - st,stm32-ltdc
> +then:
> + properties:
> + clocks:
> + maxItems: 1
> + clock-names:
> + maxItems: 1
> + items:
> + - const: lcd
> +else:
> + properties:
> + clocks:
> + maxItems: 4
> + clock-names:
> + maxItems: 4
> + items:
> + - const: bus
> + - const: lcd
Why can't 'lcd' be 1st so you aren't changing positions? Keep the items
list at the top level and just use minItems/maxItems in the if/then
schemas.
> + - const: ref
> + - const: lvds
> +
> additionalProperties: false
>
> examples:
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists