lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250725-incredible-nippy-sloth-67a31e@kuoka>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 09:45:17 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, 
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: document the Glymur
 Global Clock Controller

On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 02:59:14PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> Add device tree bindings for the Glymur Global Clock Controller to provide
> a standardized way of describing the clock controller's properties and
> behavior.

That's not a correct reason to add bindings. Why would we care about
standardized way of describing clock controller properties for Glymur?

No, explain what is the hardware you are here documenting.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ