[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250725-incredible-nippy-sloth-67a31e@kuoka>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 09:45:17 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: document the Glymur
Global Clock Controller
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 02:59:14PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> Add device tree bindings for the Glymur Global Clock Controller to provide
> a standardized way of describing the clock controller's properties and
> behavior.
That's not a correct reason to add bindings. Why would we care about
standardized way of describing clock controller properties for Glymur?
No, explain what is the hardware you are here documenting.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists