[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=VWX8aRaASWpgkfgFOwJLXOx97ykPHR50MtyBC4E8iJKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 12:45:31 +0200
From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: quic_jiangenj@...cinc.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] kcov: add trace and trace_size to struct kcov_state
> > + * Pointer to user-provided memory used by kcov. This memory may
>
> s/kcov/KCOV/ for consistency
Ack.
> > @@ -382,11 +382,13 @@ static void kcov_start(struct task_struct *t, struct kcov *kcov,
> >
> > static void kcov_stop(struct task_struct *t)
> > {
> > + int saved_sequence = t->kcov_state.sequence;
> > +
> > WRITE_ONCE(t->kcov_mode, KCOV_MODE_DISABLED);
> > barrier();
> > t->kcov = NULL;
> > - t->kcov_state.size = 0;
> > - t->kcov_state.area = NULL;
> > + t->kcov_state = (typeof(t->kcov_state)){ 0 };
>
> In a previous patch you used the following syntax, let's stick to one
> of these forms:
>
> data->saved_state = (struct kcov_state){};
Yeah, I did some research recently and figured out {} is more preferred.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists