linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 7/7] timers: Exclude isolated cpus from timer migration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aINikVzeWoKpX0_V@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 12:55:13 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 7/7] timers: Exclude isolated cpus from timer migration

Le Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 08:42:19AM +0200, Gabriele Monaco a écrit :
> On Fri, 2025-07-25 at 01:05 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> I assume it's cleaner if I squash it in 7/7 and add a
> Co-developed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> and/or
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> 
> Do you agree?

I would prefer to keep the patch standalone because it's already a
logical change that has its own motivation. It's also invasive and
could potentially cause regression (or improvement) so we want to be
able to bisect to that.

Thanks!

-- 
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs