linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/7] rust: kernel: update ARef and AlwaysRefCounted imports from sync::aref

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72=uDrg9HBVM97dgJGaC946Or964-2aF6OJVV0ih_vWuRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 16:03:07 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Shankari Anand <shankari.ak0208@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>, 
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, 
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, 
	Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, 
	Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@...il.com>, Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>, 
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, 
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, 
	Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] rust: kernel: update ARef and AlwaysRefCounted
 imports from sync::aref

On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 3:02 PM Shankari Anand
<shankari.ak0208@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Can this be picked up for review? Should I be splitting each core
> kernel file into a separate patch?

It has been only a week (and we are close to the merge window, thus
maintainers are typically dealing with other things/patches):

    https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#don-t-get-discouraged-or-impatient

Having said that, I am not sure why this one in particular has e.g.
`opp.rs` and `devres.rs` -- those are different
entries/trees/maintainers in `MAINTAINERS`. So it would likely help to
perform a split that doesn't involve different subsystems.

By the way, if you meant to send the patches as completely independent
ones, then I would suggest avoiding the series notation (e.g. "7/7")
-- at least I see them in Lore as separate threads:

    https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250717073450.15090-1-shankari.ak0208@gmail.com/

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel