linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftests: bonding: add test for LACP actor port priority

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250725072735.536abf3e@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 07:27:35 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jv@...sburgh.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>, Simon
 Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet
 <corbet@....net>, Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>, Amit Cohen
 <amcohen@...dia.com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, Alessandro
 Zanni <alessandro.zanni87@...il.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftests: bonding: add test for LACP
 actor port priority

On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 02:20:01 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 07:35:01AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:31:43 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:  
> > > Should I drop this selftest as it needs the new iproute2 feature that has
> > > not applied yet?  
> > 
> > No need, I'll add the iproute2 patch in the CI.  
> 
> Cool! Do you run CI for all posted patches?

Yes, the quick checks like shellcheck we run on individual patches,
but selftests get batched. I mean we collect patches from n hours
(currently 3) and test them all together.

> I just found that I forgot to rebase the code to latest net-next, which will
> have a conflict in include/net/bond_options.h... I see your email that the
> net-next is closed. So I think we can just leave this patchset for reviewing.
> I can post the next version after net-next re-open.

Right..