[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250725021654.3188798-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 10:16:54 +0800
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...weicloud.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tytso@....edu,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
jack@...e.cz,
ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com,
linux@...ck-us.net,
yi.zhang@...wei.com,
yi.zhang@...weicloud.com,
libaokun1@...wei.com,
yukuai3@...wei.com,
yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix crash on test_mb_mark_used kunit tests
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
mb_set_largest_free_order() requires the parameter bb_largest_free_order
and the list bb_largest_free_order_node to be initialized, and
mb_update_avg_fragment_size() requires the parameter
bb_avg_fragment_size_order and bb_avg_fragment_size_node to be
initialized too. But the test_mb_mark_used kunit tests do not init these
parameters, and trigger the following crash issue.
Pid: 35, comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G W N 6.16.0-rc4-00031-gbbe11dd13a3f-dirty
RIP: 0033:mb_set_largest_free_order+0x5c/0xc0
RSP: 00000000a0883d98 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: 0000000060aeaa28 RBX: 0000000060a2d400 RCX: 0000000000000008
RDX: 0000000060aea9c0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000060864000
RBP: 0000000060aea9c0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000060a2d400
R10: 0000000000000400 R11: 0000000060a9cc00 R12: 0000000000000006
R13: 0000000000000400 R14: 0000000000000305 R15: 0000000000000000
Kernel panic - not syncing: Segfault with no mm
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 35 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G W N 6.16.0-rc4-00031-gbbe11dd13a3f-dirty #36 NONE
Tainted: [W]=WARN, [N]=TEST
Stack:
60210c60 00000200 60a9e400 00000400
40060300280 60864000 60a9cc00 60a2d400
00000400 60aea9c0 60a9cc00 60aea9c0
Call Trace:
[<60210c60>] ? ext4_mb_generate_buddy+0x1f0/0x230
[<60215c3b>] ? test_mb_mark_used+0x28b/0x4e0
[<601df5bc>] ? ext4_get_group_desc+0xbc/0x150
[<600bf1c0>] ? ktime_get_ts64+0x0/0x190
[<60086370>] ? to_kthread+0x0/0x40
[<602b559b>] ? kunit_try_run_case+0x7b/0x100
[<60086370>] ? to_kthread+0x0/0x40
[<602b7850>] ? kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x0/0x30
[<602b7862>] ? kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x12/0x30
[<60086a51>] ? kthread+0xf1/0x250
[<6004a541>] ? new_thread_handler+0x41/0x60
[ERROR] Test: test_mb_mark_used: 0 tests run!
Fixes: bbe11dd13a3f ("ext4: fix largest free orders lists corruption on mb_optimize_scan switch")
Reported-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20250724145437.GD80823@mit.edu/
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
---
This patch applies to the kernel that has only merged bbe11dd13a3f
("ext4: fix largest free orders lists corruption on mb_optimize_scan
switch"), but not merged 458bfb991155 ("ext4: convert free groups order
lists to xarrays").
fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
index d634c12f1984..ba939be0ec55 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
@@ -802,6 +802,10 @@ static void test_mb_mark_used(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
grp->bb_free = EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb);
+ grp->bb_largest_free_order = -1;
+ grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_order = -1;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&grp->bb_largest_free_order_node);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_node);
mbt_generate_test_ranges(sb, ranges, TEST_RANGE_COUNT);
for (i = 0; i < TEST_RANGE_COUNT; i++)
test_mb_mark_used_range(test, &e4b, ranges[i].start,
@@ -875,6 +879,10 @@ static void test_mb_free_blocks(struct kunit *test)
ext4_unlock_group(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP);
grp->bb_free = 0;
+ grp->bb_largest_free_order = -1;
+ grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_order = -1;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&grp->bb_largest_free_order_node);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_node);
memset(bitmap, 0xff, sb->s_blocksize);
mbt_generate_test_ranges(sb, ranges, TEST_RANGE_COUNT);
--
2.46.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists