[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aIO05OZyhjZ5JADT@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 17:46:28 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Cc: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Monk Chiang <monk.chiang@...ive.com>,
Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@...ive.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
cleger@...osinc.com, apatel@...tanamicro.com,
ajones@...tanamicro.com, conor.dooley@...rochip.com,
charlie@...osinc.com, samuel.holland@...ive.com, bjorn@...osinc.com,
fweimer@...hat.com, jeffreyalaw@...il.com,
heinrich.schuchardt@...onical.com, andrew@...ive.com,
ved@...osinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] scs: generic scs code updated to leverage hw
assisted shadow stack
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 04:13:27PM +0000, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 04:37:03PM -0700, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> > If shadow stack have memory protections from underlying cpu, use those
> > protections. arches can define PAGE_KERNEL_SHADOWSTACK to vmalloc such shadow
> > stack pages. Hw assisted shadow stack pages grow downwards like regular
> > stack. Clang based software shadow call stack grows low to high address.
> Is this the case for all the current hardware shadow stack
> implementations? If not, we might want a separate config for the
> shadow stack direction instead.
It's true for arm64.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists